Please wait a minute...
 
中文 English
高级检索 订阅 投稿
 
 
城市设计
乡村建筑师 ——建筑师及学术机构参与中国乡村振兴的分析
莉迪亚·普莱提
The countryside architect: An analysis of Architects and Academic Institutions involved in China’s Rural Revitalization.
Lidia Preti
摘要 本文为关于建筑师及学术机构参与当代中国乡村振兴实践的研究。根据“政策—现象—结果”的分析框架,本 文研究了过去20年来乡村振兴政策对建筑实践的综合影响。这项工作基于对中国乡村振兴的长期论述,特别关 注建筑实践,以及学术界参与乡村实践的重新重视。通过分析现有的相关研究后,本文对乡村振兴的现象按照 时间进行分类,并将建筑实践置于这一框架的核心位置。通过对乡村振兴框架下的乡村建筑实践进行系统研 究,分析提出了3个不同的时期:开创阶段(1978—2003年)、成熟阶段(2004—2021年)和巩固阶段(面向 2049年)。成熟阶段是本研究的核心,在这一阶段,发现两个主要轨迹:独立的建筑实践和学术机构对政策驱 动的响应。本文选取了这些轨迹中的3个代表进行分析,分别是李晓东建筑实践、清华大学乡村振兴中心的相 关工作和DnA设计与建筑工作室的独立实践。
关键词 乡村振兴建筑师参与机构参与中国乡村    
Abstract:This work is about the study of the involvement of architects and academic institutions in rural revitalization practices in contemporary China. Following the “policy-phenomenon-effect” framework, the study introduces an innovative aspect previously unexplored, examining the comprehensive impact of rural revitalization policies on architectural practices over the past two decades. The work can be considered a contribution to a longer-standing discourse on rural revitalization in China and it concerns specifically architectural practices, and academic engagement in the renewed attention to the countryside. Following an analysis of the existing studies on the topic, the article proposes a chronological categorization of the phenomenon, placing architectural practice at the core of this framework. Through a systematic study of the architecture production in the countryside within the framework of rural revitalization, the analysis unfolds in three distinct periods: the pioneering phase (1978–2003), the maturing phase (2004–2021), and the consolidating phase (towards 2049). Within the maturing phase, which represents the core of the study, two main trajectories are identified: an independent architectural experimentation and a policy-driven response that encompasses both an institutional response from universities as well as independent practices. To support this periodization, three relevant representatives of these trajectories are selected: Li Xiaodong practice, the Rural Revitalization Center of Tsinghua University, and the independent practice of DnA_Design and Architecture studio.
Key wordsRural revitalization    Architects’ involvement    Institutions’ involvement    Chinese countryside
全文: PDF(1859 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
《城市设计》期刊编辑部    地址:北京市海淀区清华大学建筑学院    邮编:100084    电话:+86 10 62783328    传真:+86 10 62770314    
投稿平台:https://cssh.cbpt.cnki.net    信箱:urbandesign@tsinghua.edu.cn