Please wait a minute...
 
中文 English
高级检索 订阅 投稿
 
 
城市设计
国际低空空域规划政策与实践路径比较研究 ——基于美、欧、日的经验
张博雅 梁思思 庄惟敏 张 维
A Comparative Study on International Low-altitude Airspace Planning Policies and Implementation Pathways: Experience from the United States, Europe, and Japan
Boya Zhang, Sisi Liang, Weimin Zhuang, Wei Zhang
摘要 低空经济正推动城市空间向三维立体拓展,低空空域已转变为亟需地面系统深度支撑的立体运行空间。本文 以低空空域规划为核心,在梳理国内现状基础上,对比研究了美国先进空中交通(AAM)的战略逻辑、欧洲 U-space的服务化治理及日本的低空应用场景化实验等政策及实践。基于国际经验,文章探讨了面向地—空协 同规划响应的低空空域规划路径:建议在空间层面从空中航线转向地—空垂直协同、设施层面统筹能源—交 通—信息多网体系、运行层面以数字化设计支撑差异化发展,并将社会许可纳入规划评估框架,旨在为我国相 关低空空域规划治理提供参考。
关键词 低空经济低空空域规划先进空中交通(AAM)地—空协同社会许可数据底座低空基础设施    
Abstract:The low-altitude economy is driving the expansion of urban space into the third dimension, transforming low-altitude airspace into a volumetric operational space that necessitates deep support from ground-based systems. Focusing on low-altitude airspace planning and reviewing the current status in China, this paper conducts a comparative study of strategic logic of advanced air mobility (AAM) in the United States, the service-oriented governance of U-space in Europe, and the scenario-based experimentation in Japan. Drawing on these international experiences, the study explores planning response pathways oriented toward “ground-air integration”. It proposes transcending the limitations of isolated airspace designation by integrating “energy-transport-information” into volumetric operational units and incorporating the “social license” into the planning assessment framework. The findings aim to provide theoretical references and practical guidance for relevant planning endeavors.
Key wordsLow-altitude economy    Low-altitude airspace planning    Advanced air mobility (AAM)    Ground-air integration    Social license    Digital foundation    Low-altitude infrastructure
全文: PDF(1807 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
《城市设计》期刊编辑部    地址:北京市海淀区清华大学建筑学院    邮编:100084    电话:+86 10 62783328    传真:+86 10 62770314    
投稿平台:https://cssh.cbpt.cnki.net    信箱:urbandesign@tsinghua.edu.cn